Editorial policy

comparenotetakers.com publishes neutral side by side comparisons of AI notetakers. These are the rules every post follows.

One question per post. Each comparison answers one buyer question, and its columns are chosen to answer that question. The methodology page explains the comparison grid.

First party sources only. Figures come from the vendor's own pricing pages, help centers, documentation, security pages and changelogs. Third party summaries are not cited as evidence.

Report what the page says. If a vendor's page does not state something, the table says it is not listed. If two of a vendor's pages disagree, the post says so and cites both.

Plain, careful wording. Posts say a tool was reviewed or compared against its documentation. Vendor wording is quoted directly where the exact phrasing matters, such as a data training statement.

Written verdicts, no scores. Picks are written per use case. There are no point scores, star ratings or aggregate scores.

Vendor input. Vendors can point out a change by sending a link to a public page that documents it.

Money. The site carries no ads. Ownership is covered on the About page.

Dates. Every post shows its Updated date, and pricing and plan limits are rechecked when a vendor changes them, and at least every 90 days.